User reports
0
Near baseline. 0 in the last hour. Typical hour is about 0.
All services / Cloud & developer
texttoquant.com · Cloud & developer
Is TextToQuant down?
Checks are succeeding, user reports are near the baseline, and the vendor status page is clear.
Live diagnosis
Is it just me?
Finds the most likely layer (the service, your ISP or area, DNS, or your Wi-Fi) and gives two steps to try.
Your browser → texttoquant.com—
Your browser → us—
Our checksReaching it
Official · ReportsAll clear · Near baseline
DNS (1.1.1.1 · Google)—
Your provider—
Connection—
Upstream—
Press Run testYour browser tests the site, us, and two public DNS resolvers. We never store your IP; only anonymous counts by network and region.
Live outage map
No reports in the last 24 hours.
Dots are whole states, provinces or countries, never exact locations. We never store IP addresses. Every report with a known place can appear on the map. Updates every minute.
What's broken
Recent reports
Each row is a time, a coarse place, and a problem type from a new report. Optional notes stay private. Places with fewer than 3 reports in the last 8 days are shown without a location.
No public reports yet.
Our checks
Reaching it
Last checked 1 hr ago. Last stored result reached it in 333 ms.
Official status
All clear
No active incidents in the official feed Official status page
Reports and checks
Numbers behind the chart
| Time (UTC) | Reports | Baseline | Latency | Failed checks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 10 | 0 | 0.0 | 116 ms | 0 |
| Mon 12 | 0 | 0.0 | 177 ms | 0 |
| Mon 15 | 0 | 0.0 | 826 ms | 0 |
| Mon 17 | 0 | 0.0 | 233 ms | 0 |
| Mon 19 | 0 | 0.0 | 907 ms | 0 |
| Mon 21 | 0 | 0.0 | 988 ms | 0 |
| Mon 23 | 0 | 0.0 | 473 ms | 0 |
| Tue 01 | 0 | 0.0 | 1160 ms | 0 |
| Tue 03 | 0 | 0.0 | 447 ms | 0 |
| Tue 05 | 0 | 0.0 | 1086 ms | 0 |
| Tue 08 | 0 | 0.0 | 922 ms | 0 |
| Tue 10 | 0 | 0.0 | 343 ms | 0 |
| Tue 12 | 0 | 0.0 | 152 ms | 0 |
| Tue 14 | 0 | 0.0 | 740 ms | 0 |
| Tue 16 | 0 | 0.0 | 425 ms | 0 |
| Tue 19 | 0 | 0.0 | 140 ms | 0 |
| Tue 21 | 0 | 0.0 | 297 ms | 0 |
| Tue 23 | 0 | 0.0 | 517 ms | 0 |
| Wed 01 | 0 | 0.0 | 117 ms | 0 |
| Wed 04 | 0 | 0.0 | 69 ms | 0 |
| Wed 06 | 0 | 0.0 | 467 ms | 0 |
| Wed 08 | 0 | 0.0 | 1242 ms | 0 |
| Wed 10 | 0 | 0.0 | 446 ms | 0 |
| Wed 13 | 0 | 0.0 | 278 ms | 0 |
| Wed 15 | 0 | 0.0 | 421 ms | 0 |
| Wed 17 | 0 | 0.0 | 132 ms | 0 |
| Wed 19 | 0 | 0.0 | 355 ms | 0 |
| Wed 21 | 0 | 0.0 | 427 ms | 0 |
| Wed 23 | 0 | 0.0 | 435 ms | 0 |
| Thu 02 | 0 | 0.0 | 222 ms | 0 |
| Thu 04 | 0 | 0.0 | 1343 ms | 0 |
| Thu 06 | 0 | 0.0 | 155 ms | 0 |
| Thu 08 | 0 | 0.0 | 1137 ms | 0 |
| Thu 10 | 0 | 0.0 | 112 ms | 0 |
| Thu 12 | 0 | 0.0 | 186 ms | 0 |
| Thu 14 | 0 | 0.0 | 433 ms | 0 |
| Thu 16 | 0 | 0.0 | 353 ms | 0 |
| Thu 18 | 0 | 0.0 | 545 ms | 0 |
| Thu 20 | 0 | 0.0 | 440 ms | 0 |
| Thu 22 | 0 | 0.0 | 906 ms | 0 |
| Fri 00 | 0 | 0.0 | 170 ms | 0 |
| Fri 02 | 0 | 0.0 | 325 ms | 0 |
| Fri 04 | 0 | 0.0 | 150 ms | 0 |
| Fri 07 | 0 | 0.0 | 382 ms | 0 |
| Fri 09 | 0 | 0.0 | 326 ms | 0 |
| Fri 11 | 0 | 0.0 | 345 ms | 0 |
| Fri 13 | 0 | 0.0 | 388 ms | 0 |
| Fri 15 | 0 | 0.0 | 333 ms | 0 |
Reliability
100%Uptime · 30 days
100%Uptime · 90 days
0 / 0Outages · 30 / 90 days
—Average outage
100% uptime · No user reports in the last 24h
90 days ago → today. Uptime is from our own HTTP checks; outages are incidents that lasted long enough to list. We have 7 days of data so far, so the 90-day numbers fill in over time.
Embed this status: free live TextToQuant badge
Free, no iframe or script. Updates every minute and links back here. More options on the embed page · badge docs · JSON · MCP server
Past outages
No outages on record for TextToQuant yet. Outages of 10 minutes or more get their own page here.
Having trouble with TextToQuant?
One report per service every 10 minutes from this network. No account.
Follow TextToQuant
Get an email when TextToQuant goes down and when it recovers. Free. Confirm by email, unsubscribe anytime.
Want it in a team channel? Send TextToQuant alerts to Slack, Discord or a webhook — free.
About TextToQuant
TextToQuant is listed in our Cloud & developer category and checked at texttoquant.com. TextToQuant turns your ideas into rules, runs them against a decade of markets, and hands back a full strategy report with everything you need to validate your edge.
TextToQuant publishes an official status page at status.texttoquant.com; when we can read it, its incident level is folded into the status shown here.
What usually goes wrong with cloud & developer services: API errors, failed deploys or builds, and dashboard or console outages.
Measured uptime from our checks: 100% over 7 days of checks. No public incidents logged since monitoring began 7 days ago.
Response time over the last 24 hours: 396 ms average, 150–906 ms range across 12 successful checks.
Questions
Is TextToQuant down right now?
Checks are succeeding, user reports are near the baseline, and the vendor status page is clear.
When was TextToQuant last down?
We have not recorded a public TextToQuant incident since monitoring began 7 days ago.
What is TextToQuant's uptime?
From our own checks: 100% over 7 days of checks.
How fast does TextToQuant respond?
396 ms on average over the last 24 hours (150–906 ms).
Does TextToQuant have an official status page?
Yes, at https://status.texttoquant.com.
TextToQuant not working for me but the status is fine. What now?
It is usually local: try another browser or the app, switch between Wi-Fi and mobile data, and clear the cache. For cloud & developer services, watch for API errors, failed deploys or builds, and dashboard or console outages. If many people report TextToQuant here at once, the problem is on TextToQuant's side.
How we detect and verify outages · Dispute this report · We review disputes within 24 hours.
Community comments
Share what you are seeing with TextToQuant. No account needed. Comments are public, separate from outage reports. Do not include personal information.
No links or domains. 3 comments per service and 6 total per hour, per device and network. New contributors get one visible comment; further comments wait for review.