Damn, is it down?

All services / fraud.net / Nov 6, 2026 / Evidence

Evidence

Evidence: fraud.net, Nov 6, 2026

The raw data behind this incident page: every check we ran, the regions that failed, the error codes and the user report curve. Check our work.

Our verdict: Retracted: we published this in error. The evidence is kept here so you can see why. How we verify outages

Download JSON Download CSV Also at /api/v1/outages/1023/evidence. Free to reuse with attribution.

0 of 38Checks failed in the window
0 of 4Regions failing
—Most common error code
0Peak user reports in 15 min

Window: to . Checks from 15 minutes before the start to 15 minutes after recovery (or now). Report curve: one hour either side. Tables are in UTC.

Error codes

No failed checks with an error code in this window.

http_5xx = the site answered with that server error; timeout = no answer in time; network = the connection failed; origin_reset = the connection to the site's server was reset (HTTP 520–527) and a second fetch path got no answer either; no_status = no usable answer. Bot walls (bot_*), certificate problems on a server that answers (cert_*) and maintenance pages count as up.

Regions

  • We check from: US East, US West, Europe, Asia-Pacific.
  • Failing during this incident: none recorded.

Regional probes run from Cloudflare data centers in each region. We keep the latest regional result per region, plus a timestamped timeline entry when a region starts failing during an incident, so older incidents show the failing regions and when each was first seen, not every regional probe.

Report curve

No user reports for fraud.net in this window.

User reports per 15-minute bucket. Counts only: no reporter identity, IP address, location or text is published. We call reports a spike at 5 or more in 15 minutes.

Raw checks

38 checks, 0 failed.

All 38 checks, passes included
All checks in the window
Check time (UTC)Probe ran (UTC)ResultHTTPLatencyError codeTrigger
Pass200171 ms—scheduled
Pass200101 ms—scheduled
Pass20064 ms—scheduled
Pass20049 ms—scheduled
Pass200104 ms—scheduled
Pass20048 ms—scheduled
Pass200125 ms—scheduled
Pass20050 ms—on demand
Pass200139 ms—scheduled
Pass20082 ms—scheduled
Pass200108 ms—scheduled
Pass200127 ms—scheduled
Pass200100 ms—scheduled
Pass20086 ms—scheduled
Pass200129 ms—scheduled
Pass200130 ms—scheduled
Pass20068 ms—scheduled
Pass20085 ms—scheduled
Pass20084 ms—scheduled
Pass20085 ms—scheduled
Pass20062 ms—scheduled
Pass200156 ms—scheduled
Pass20063 ms—scheduled
Pass20061 ms—scheduled
Pass20077 ms—scheduled
Pass20080 ms—scheduled
Pass200128 ms—scheduled
Pass20036 ms—scheduled
Pass20079 ms—scheduled
Pass20073 ms—scheduled
Pass20092 ms—scheduled
Pass200123 ms—scheduled
Pass20079 ms—scheduled
Pass20069 ms—scheduled
Pass20072 ms—scheduled
Pass20068 ms—scheduled
Pass20062 ms—scheduled
Pass20063 ms—scheduled

Every main HTTP check of this service in the window, oldest first: the scheduled check time, when the probe actually ran, the result, HTTP status, latency and the stored error code. A failed check is a 5xx or 408 answer, a timeout or a failed connection; bot walls and maintenance pages count as passing and are noted in passing_notes.

How to check this

  • Compare checks.rows with the outage page: the first and last failed checks bound the incident times we published.
  • error_codes counts every failed check by its stored code; recount it from checks.rows.
  • report_curve.points sum to summary.reports_in_curve; the peak is summary.peak_reports_15m.
  • Disagree? Dispute it at https://damnisitdown.com/support?dispute=1023

No personal data: no reporter identities, IP addresses, emails, report text or reporter locations. User reports are aggregate 15-minute counts.

← Back to the incident · Methodology · Dispute this report